![]() Brave now supports :has() but that’s not enough in some cases, it can cover most cases, but not all. The only thing Brave can’t do in some cases is Procedurals, Procedurals even uBlock don’t recommend it but in some cases it is the only way to achieve something. Of course, it still doesn’t support some features which are in uBlock lists, so that can be an issue in few websites, Brave uses the same default list as uBlock, so the features are mostly to match uBlock features, so the uBlock lists can fully be used by Brave, that’s what feature parity is meant to do, but Brave has features that can do the same uBlock uses, so technically Brave can do the same with some brain work.īut for example, I run both, and always make sure Brave is the one doing all the job, if I see uBlock doing something, I check to see what and how I can force Brave to do the same, so in my case Brave does the job more than any vanilla Brave adblocker. That’s why you can see search engine ads in Standard, since they are first-party ads.īrave is the only one offering something like that, everyone else really is Ads = Easylist and trackers = EasyPrivacy, which is not accurate.Īnyway, Brave is fine for 99% of websites, it supports almost all features uBlock does. ![]() The only thing you can run is Standard on, because Standard will block 3p only (and malicious 1p) and Aggressive will block both 1p and 3p. In 2023, ads are going to be probably tracking you, so there is not distinction to really whitelist one and leave the other on.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |